Lind Hall 216
Meetings will be on Thursday mornings (approximately every other week) from 8-9:15 am
Optional background reading: Fidler, Fiona and Wilcox, John, "Reproducibility of Scientific Results", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/scientific-reproducibility
| September 19: Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS medicine, 2(8), e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 |
| October 3: Higginson, A. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Current incentives for scientists lead to underpowered studies with erroneous conclusions. PLoS Biology, 14(11), e2000995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000995 |
| October 17: Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160384 |
| October 31: Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific Utopia: I. Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 217-243. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215 |
| November 14: John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological science, 23(5), 524-532. doi: 10.1177/0956797611430953 |
| December 5: Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Du Sert, N. P., ... & Ioannidis, J. P. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021 |